Graph pangenome captures missing heritability and empowers tomato breeding
Maher, B. Personal genomes: the case of the missing heritability. Nature 456, 18–21 (2008).
Google Scholar
Manolio, T. A. et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461, 747–753 (2009).
Google Scholar
Young, A. I. Solving the missing heritability problem. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008222 (2019).
Google Scholar
De Coster, W., Weissensteiner, M. H. & Sedlazeck, F. J. Towards population-scale long-read sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 572–587 (2021).
Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M. Sizing up human height variation. Nat. Genet. 40, 489–490 (2008).
Google Scholar
Hemani, G., Knott, S. & Haley, C. An evolutionary perspective on epistasis and the missing heritability. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003295 (2013).
Google Scholar
Brachi, B., Morris, G. P. & Borevitz, J. O. Genome-wide association studies in plants: the missing heritability is in the field. Genome Biol. 12, 232 (2011).
Google Scholar
Jeffares, D. C. et al. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 8, 14061 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yang, J. et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 42, 565–569 (2010).
Google Scholar
Eichler, E. E. et al. Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 446–450 (2010).
Google Scholar
Garrison, E. et al. Variation graph toolkit improves read mapping by representing genetic variation in the reference. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 875–879 (2018).
Google Scholar
Martiniano, R., Garrison, E., Jones, E. R., Manica, A. & Durbin, R. Removing reference bias and improving indel calling in ancient DNA data analysis by mapping to a sequence variation graph. Genome Biol. 21, 250 (2020).
Google Scholar
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).
Google Scholar
Jayakodi, M. et al. The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding. Nature 588, 284–289 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hufford, M. B. et al. De novo assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of 26 diverse maize genomes. Science 373, 655–662 (2021).
Google Scholar
The Computational Pan-Genomics Consortium. Computational pan-genomics: status, promises and challenges. Brief. Bioinform. 19, 118–135 (2018).
Rakocevic, G. et al. Fast and accurate genomic analyses using genome graphs. Nat. Genet. 51, 354–362 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, S. et al. Paragraph: a graph-based structural variant genotyper for short-read sequence data. Genome Biol. 20, 291 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sirén, J. et al. Pangenomics enables genotyping of known structural variants in 5202 diverse genomes. Science 374, eabg8871 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Pan-genome of wild and cultivated soybeans. Cell 182, 162–176 (2020).
Google Scholar
Qin, P. et al. Pan-genome analysis of 33 genetically diverse rice accessions reveals hidden genomic variations. Cell 184, 3542–3558 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ebert, P. et al. Haplotype-resolved diverse human genomes and integrated analysis of structural variation. Science 372, eabf7117 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hosmani, P. S. et al. An improved de novo assembly and annotation of the tomato reference genome using single-molecule sequencing, Hi-C proximity ligation and optical maps. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/767764 (2019).
Alonge, M. et al. Major impacts of widespread structural variation on gene expression and crop improvement in tomato. Cell 182, 145–161 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Genome of Solanum pimpinellifolium provides insights into structural variants during tomato breeding. Nat. Commun. 11, 5817 (2020).
Google Scholar
Causse, M. et al. Whole genome resequencing in tomato reveals variation associated with introgression and breeding events. BMC Genom. 14, 791 (2013).
Google Scholar
Aflitos, S. et al. Exploring genetic variation in the tomato (Solanum section Lycopersicon) clade by whole‐genome sequencing. Plant J. 80, 136–148 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bolger, A. et al. The genome of the stress-tolerant wild tomato species Solanum pennellii. Nat. Genet. 46, 1034–1038 (2014).
Google Scholar
Lin, T. et al. Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding. Nat. Genet. 46, 1220–1226 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tieman, D. et al. A chemical genetic roadmap to improved tomato flavor. Science 355, 391–394 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gao, L. et al. The tomato pan-genome uncovers new genes and a rare allele regulating fruit flavor. Nat. Genet. 51, 1044–1051 (2019).
Google Scholar
Poplin, R. et al. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 983–987 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sim, S.-C. et al. Development of a large SNP genotyping array and generation of high-density genetic maps in tomato. PLoS ONE 7, e40563 (2012).
Google Scholar
Speed, D., Hemani, G., Johnson, M. R. & Balding, D. J. Improved heritability estimation from genome-wide SNPs. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 91, 1011–1021 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zhu, G. et al. Rewiring of the fruit metabolome in tomato breeding. Cell 172, 249–261 (2018).
Google Scholar
Vinces, M. D., Legendre, M., Caldara, M., Hagihara, M. & Verstrepen, K. J. Unstable tandem repeats in promoters confer transcriptional evolvability. Science 324, 1213–1216 (2009).
Google Scholar
The GTEx Consortium. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 369, 1318–1330 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hormozdiari, F. et al. Widespread allelic heterogeneity in complex traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100, 789–802 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E. & Visscher, P. M. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76–82 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hormozdiari, F., Jung, J., Eskin, E. & Joo, J. W. J. MARS: leveraging allelic heterogeneity to increase power of association testing. Genome Biol. 22, 128 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. & Michoel, T. Controlling false discoveries in Bayesian gene networks with lasso regression p-values. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.07011 (2017).
Sudmant, P. H. et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature 526, 75–81 (2015).
Google Scholar
Collins, R. L. et al. A structural variation reference for medical and population genetics. Nature 581, 444–451 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mancuso, N. et al. Probabilistic fine-mapping of transcriptome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 51, 675–682 (2019).
Google Scholar
Boyle, E. A., Li, Y. I. & Pritchard, J. K. An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169, 1177–1186 (2017).
Google Scholar
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 9, 559 (2008).
Google Scholar
Della Coletta, R., Qiu, Y., Ou, S., Hufford, M. B. & Hirsch, C. N. How the pan-genome is changing crop genomics and improvement. Genome Biol. 22, 3 (2021).
Google Scholar
Li, N. et al. Identification of the carbohydrate and organic acid metabolism genes responsible for brix in tomato fruit by transcriptome and metabolome analysis. Front. Genet. 12, 714942 (2021).
Google Scholar
Mahmoud, M. et al. Structural variant calling: the long and the short of it. Genome Biol. 20, 246 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y. & Pevzner, P. A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 540–546 (2019).
Google Scholar
Nurk, S. et al. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome Res. 30, 1291–1305 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).
Google Scholar
Awad, M. & Gan, X. GALA: gap-free chromosome-scale assembly with long reads. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.15.097428 (2020).
Alonge, M. et al. RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes. Genome Biol. 20, 224 (2019).
Google Scholar
Holt, C. & Yandell, M. MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinform. 12, 491 (2011).
Google Scholar
Liu, P., Soukup, A. A., Bresnick, E. H., Dewey, C. N. & Keleş, S. PRAM: a novel pooling approach for discovering intergenic transcripts from large-scale RNA sequencing experiments. Genome Res. 30, 1655–1666 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019).
Google Scholar
Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 290–295 (2015).
Google Scholar
Niknafs, Y. S., Pandian, B., Iyer, H. K., Chinnaiyan, A. M. & Iyer, M. K. TACO produces robust multisample transcriptome assemblies from RNA-seq. Nat. Methods 14, 68–70 (2017).
Google Scholar
Korf, I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinform. 5, 59 (2004).
Google Scholar
Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435–W439 (2006).
Google Scholar
Pham, G. M. et al. Construction of a chromosome-scale long-read reference genome assembly for potato. Gigascience 9, giaa100 (2020).
Google Scholar
Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hoff, K., Lomsadze, A., Borodovsky, M. & Stanke, M. Whole-genome annotation with BRAKER. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 65–95 (2019).
Google Scholar
Brůna, T., Lomsadze, A. & Borodovsky, M. GeneMark-EP+: eukaryotic gene prediction with self-training in the space of genes and proteins. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqaa026 (2020).
Google Scholar
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sedlazeck, F. J. et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat. Methods 15, 461–468 (2018).
Google Scholar
Heller, D. & Vingron, M. SVIM: structural variant identification using mapped long reads. Bioinformatics 35, 2907–2915 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jiang, T. et al. Long-read-based human genomic structural variation detection with cuteSV. Genome Biol. 21, 189 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nattestad, M. & Schatz, M. C. Assemblytics: a web analytics tool for the detection of variants from an assembly. Bioinformatics 32, 3021–3023 (2016).
Google Scholar
Marçais, G. et al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005944 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ondov, B. D. et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol. 17, 132 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, H., Feng, X. & Chu, C. The design and construction of reference pangenome graphs with minigraph. Genome Biol. 21, 265 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525–527 (2016).
Google Scholar
Stegle, O., Parts, L., Piipari, M., Winn, J. & Durbin, R. Using probabilistic estimation of expression residuals (PEER) to obtain increased power and interpretability of gene expression analyses. Nat. Protoc. 7, 500–507 (2012).
Google Scholar
Speed, D., Holmes, J. & Balding, D. J. Evaluating and improving heritability models using summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 52, 458–462 (2020).
Google Scholar
Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).
Google Scholar
Endelman, J. B. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome 4, 250–255 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kearse, M. et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649 (2012).
Google Scholar