Exploring the association between microbiota and behaviour in suckling piglets
Collins, S. M., Surette, M. & Bercik, P. The interplay between the intestinal microbiota and the brain. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 735–742 (2012).
Google Scholar
De Palma, G., Collins, S. M., Bercik, P. & Verdu, E. F. The microbiota–gut–brain axis in gastrointestinal disorders: Stressed bugs, stressed brain or both?. J. Physiol. 592, 2989–2997 (2014).
Google Scholar
Sherwin, E., Bordenstein, S. R., Quinn, J. L., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota and the social brain. Science (80-). 366, (2019).
Valles-Colomer, M. et al. The neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 623–632 (2019).
Google Scholar
Johnson, K. V. A. & Foster, K. R. Why does the microbiome affect behaviour?. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 647–655 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bravo, J. A. et al. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16050–16055 (2011).
Google Scholar
Davidson, G. L., Cooke, A. C., Johnson, C. N. & Quinn, J. L. The gut microbiome as a driver of individual variation in cognition and functional behaviour. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, (2018).
Ezenwa, V. O., Gerardo, N. M., Inouye, D. W., Medina, M. & Xavier, J. B. Animal behavior and the microbiome. Science (80-). 338, 198–199 (2012).
Google Scholar
Cryan, J. F. & Dinan, T. G. Mind-altering microorganisms: The impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 701–712 (2012).
Google Scholar
Dobbing, J. & Sands, J. Comparative aspects of the brain growth spurt. Early Hum. Dev. 3, 79–83 (1979).
Google Scholar
Conrad, M. S. & Johnson, R. W. The domestic piglet: An important model for investigating the neurodevelopmental consequences of early life insults. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 3, 245–264 (2015).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. L. A., Vieira-Silva, S., Liston, A. & Raes, J. How informative is the mouse for human gut microbiota research?. DMM Dis. Model. Mech. 8, 1–16 (2015).
Google Scholar
Verbeek, E., Keeling, L., Landberg, R., Lindberg, J. E. & Dicksved, J. The gut microbiota and microbial metabolites are associated with tail biting in pigs. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–14 (2021).
Google Scholar
He, Y. et al. Exploring the role of gut microbiota in host feeding behavior among breeds in swine. BMC Microbiol. 22, 1–15 (2022).
Google Scholar
Parois, S. P., Eicher, S. D., Lindemann, S. R. & Marchant, J. N. Potential improvements of the cognition of piglets through a synbiotic supplementation from 1 to 28 days via the gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–15 (2021).
Google Scholar
Choudhury, R. et al. Early life feeding accelerates gut microbiome maturation and suppresses acute post-weaning stress in piglets. Environ. Microbiol. 00, (2021).
Choudhury, R. et al. Impact of early-life feeding on local intestinal microbiota and digestive system development in piglets. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–16 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hessing, M. J. C., Hagelsø, A. M., Schouten, W. G. P., Wiepkema, P. R. & Van Beek, J. A. M. Individual behavioral and physiological strategies in pigs. Physiol. Behav. 55, 39–46 (1994).
Google Scholar
Zebunke, M., Nürnberg, G., Melzer, N. & Puppe, B. The backtest in pigs revisited—Inter-situational behaviour and animal classification. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 194, 7–13 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bolhuis, J. E., Parmentier, H. K., Schouten, W. G. P., Schrama, J. W. & Wiegant, V. M. Effects of housing and individual coping characteristics on immune responses of pigs. Physiol. Behav. 79, 289–296 (2003).
Google Scholar
Düpjan, S., Schön, P. C., Puppe, B., Tuchscherer, A. & Manteuffel, G. Differential vocal responses to physical and mental stressors in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 114, 105–115 (2008).
Google Scholar
Manteuffel, G., Puppe, B. & Schön, P. C. Vocalization of farm animals as a measure of welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 88, 163–182 (2004).
Google Scholar
Fraser, D. Vocalizations of isolated piglets. I. Sources of variation and relationships among measures. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1, 387–394 (1975).
Google Scholar
Fraser, D. The vocalizations and other behaviour of growing pigs in an ‘open field’ test. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1, 3–16 (1974).
Google Scholar
Reimert, I., Rodenburg, T. B., Ursinus, W. W., Kemp, B. & Bolhuis, J. E. Responses to novel situations of female and castrated male pigs with divergent social breeding values and different backtest classifications in barren and straw-enriched housing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 151, 24–35 (2014).
Google Scholar
Donald, R. D., Healy, S. D., Lawrence, A. B. & Rutherford, K. M. D. Emotionality in growing pigs: Is the open field a valid test?. Physiol. Behav. 104, 906–913 (2011).
Google Scholar
Ursinus, W. W. et al. Relations between peripheral and brain serotonin measures and behavioural responses in a novelty test in pigs. Physiol. Behav. 118, 88–96 (2013).
Google Scholar
Andersen, I. L., Færevik, G., Bøe, K. E., Janczak, A. M. & Bakken, M. Effects of diazepam on the behaviour of weaned pigs in three putative models of anxiety. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 68, 121–130 (2000).
Google Scholar
Bailey, M. T. et al. Exposure to a social stressor alters the structure of the intestinal microbiota: Implications for stressor-induced immunomodulation. Brain. Behav. Immun. 25, 397–407 (2011).
Google Scholar
De Palma, G. et al. Microbiota and host determinants of behavioural phenotype in maternally separated mice. Nat. Commun. 6, 7735 (2015).
Google Scholar
Simpson, C. A., Mu, A., Haslam, N., Schwartz, O. S. & Simmons, J. G. Feeling down? A systematic review of the gut microbiota in anxiety/depression and irritable bowel syndrome. J. Affect. Disord. 266, 429–446 (2020).
Google Scholar
Cussotto, S. et al. Differential effects of psychotropic drugs on microbiome composition and gastrointestinal function. Psychopharmacology 236, 1671–1685 (2019).
Google Scholar
Forkman, B., Boissy, A., Meunier-Salaün, M. C., Canali, E. & Jones, R. B. A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiol. Behav. 92, 340–374 (2007).
Google Scholar
Clouard, C., Gerrits, W. J., van Kerkhof, I., Smink, W. & Bolhuis, J. E. Dietary linoleic and α-linolenic acids affect anxiety-related responses and exploratory activity in growing pigs. J. Nutr. 145, 358–364 (2015).
Google Scholar
Backus, B. L., Sutherland, M. A. & Brooks, T. A. Relationship between environmental enrichment and the response to novelty in laboratory-housed pigs. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 56, 735–741 (2017).
Google Scholar
Iversen, M. W. et al. Heritability of the backtest response in piglets and its genetic correlations with production traits. Animal 11, 556–563 (2017).
Google Scholar
Velie, B. D., Maltecca, C. & Cassady, J. P. Genetic relationships among pig behavior, growth, backfat, and loin muscle area. J. Anim. Sci. 87, 2767–2773 (2009).
Google Scholar
Zebunke, M., Repsilber, D., Nürnberg, G., Wittenburg, D. & Puppe, B. The backtest in pigs revisited—An analysis of intra-situational behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 169, 17–25 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bolhuis, J. E., Schouten, W. G. P., Leeuw, J. A. D., Schrama, J. W. & Wiegant, V. M. Individual coping characteristics, rearing conditions and behavioural flexibility in pigs. Behav. Brain Res. 152, 351–360 (2004).
Google Scholar
Bolhuis, J. E., Schouten, W. G. P. P., Schrama, J. W. & Wiegant, V. M. Behavioural development of pigs with different coping characteristics in barren and substrate-enriched housing conditions. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 93, 213–228 (2005).
Google Scholar
Kanitz, E. et al. Coping style of pigs is associated with different behavioral, neurobiological and immune responses to stressful challenges. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 13, 1–15 (2019).
Google Scholar
Middelkoop, A. et al. Effects of creep feed provision on behavior and performance of piglets around weaning. Front. Vet. Sci. 7, 879 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yu, Z. & Morrison, M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 36, 808–812 (2004).
Google Scholar
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 590–596 (2013).
Google Scholar
ter Braak, C. J. F. & Smilauer, P. Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide: Software for Ordination, Version 5.0. (Microcomputer Power, 2012).
Morgan, X. C. et al. Dysfunction of the intestinal microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease and treatment. Genome Biol. 13, (2012).